Live
- MLA Sri Ganesh Engages ASHA Workers and Resource Persons in Caste Census Meeting
- Supreme Court verdict on validity of Preamble modification in 1976 likely on November 25
- ‘Zebra’ movie review: A gripping tale of banking fraud and redemption
- Saurabh Netravalkar, Unmukt Chand, Dwayne Smith and Rahkeem Cornwall headline USPL
- NPP asks members not to attend meeting called by Biren govt
- Bulls roar on Dalal Street, Sensex and Nifty up over 2 pc
- Over 880,000 people displaced in Lebanon, food security deteriorates: UN
- BGT 2024-25: Bumrah picks 4-17 as Australia trail India by 83 runs in 17-wicket day
- Calcutta High Court stays order on demolition of hotels in Bengal’s Mandarmani
- AP Legislative Council Approves Key Bills
Just In
AP government agrees to court-monitored CBI probe
New Delhi: The Andhra Pradesh government on Friday told the Supreme Court that it is agree for court monitored CBI probe into alleged irregularities...
New Delhi: The Andhra Pradesh government on Friday told the Supreme Court that it is agree for court monitored CBI probe into alleged irregularities in land transactions during shifting of the State capital to Amaravati.
It urged the court to lift the stay granted by Andhra Pradesh High Court on the probe by the Special Investigating Team (SIT) into the alleged scam and allow the investigation to go on in the case.
The YSRCP government had earlier constituted the 10-member SIT, headed by a Deputy Inspector General of Police rank IPS officer, to conduct a comprehensive investigation into various alleged irregularities, particularly the land deals in the Amaravati Capital Region, during the previous Chandrababu Naidu government.
A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and R S Reddy was told by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the State government, that they are agreeable to some of the prayers sought by the State's former Advocate General Dammalapati Srinivas before the High Court.
"We are agreeable to some of the prayers sought by petitioner before the High Court (Dammalapati Srinivas). First, we are agreeable that no coercive action will be taken against him.
Secondly, we are agreeable that court monitored probe should be there but it should be by the CBI, as we have earlier requested for the CBI probe but it didn't happen", Dhavan said in the brief hearing.
He said that the State only urge the court that investigation by the SIT should be allowed to continue till the time probe is given to the CBI. The bench told Dhavan that it will hear the matter on non-miscellaneous day as the court was not available in post lunch session.
The bench posted the matter for further hearing on April 7 as top of the board matter. The top court was hearing an appeal filed by Andhra Pradesh government through advocate Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki against the September 15, last year order of the High Court.
On November 25, last year, the top court had stayed the High Court direction restraining the media from publishing news regarding an FIR lodged on alleged irregularities in land transactions during shifting of the State capital to Amaravati.
It had refused to stay at this stage the other directions of the High Court including the stay on probe into the FIR in the matter.
The top court had not issued notice to Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy on the appeal as the High Court had not issued notice to him and had sought responses from others including the Director General of Police of Andhra Pradesh.
It had said that court is also not issuing notice to Srinivas, on whose plea the High Court had passed the order, as he has appeared before it on caveat. The report of a Cabinet Sub-Committee on the procedural, legal and financial irregularities and fraudulent transactions concerned with various projects, including the issues related to land in the CRDA region will form the basis for the SIT probe, the Andhra Pradesh government had said.
Andhra Pradesh government had earlier argued the High Court could not have said that no investigation should take place in the case and should not have given directions that no coercive action be taken and no gag order could have been passed.
It had contended that the writ petition before the high court is "political" and against the Chief Minister and is based on reliable sources.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com