Live
- Nizamabad MP Dharmapuri Arvind and Jagtial MLA Dr. Sanjay Kumar Meet CM Revanth Reddy
- Hyderabad CP CV Anand Issues Stern Warning to Bouncers
- MP Laxman Criticizes Police Conduct, Calls for Support for Victims' Families
- Fire Breaks Out in Kachiguda-Chennai Egmore Express, Passengers Evacuated Safely
- CM Revanth Reddy Condemns Attacks on Film Personalities' Homes, Calls for Strict Action
- Victory Venkatesh and Nandamuri Balakrishna to Set Screens on Fire with Unstoppable Season 4
- Over 71.81 crore Ayushman Bharat Health Account numbers generated: Centre
- In special gesture, Kuwait's Prime Minister sees-off PM Modi at airport after conclusion of historic visit
- Veer crowned PGTI Ranking champion, Shaurya wins emerging player honour
- Sr National Badminton: Unseeded Rounak Chauhan, Adarshini Shri reach singles semis
Breather for Anil Ambani
Anil Ambani
Bombay HC directs I-T dept not to take any coercive action against Reliance Group’s chairman on notice under Black Money Act till Nov 17
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Income-Tax (I-T) department not to take any coercive action against Reliance Group chairman Anil Ambani till November 17 on a show cause notice issued to him seeking to prosecute him under the Black Money Act.
The I-T department had issued the notice to Ambani on August 8, 2022 for allegedly evading Rs 420 crore in taxes on undisclosed funds worth more than Rs 814 crore held in two Swiss bank accounts.
The department has charged Ambani (63) with "wilful" evasion, saying he "intentionally" did not disclose his foreign bank account details and financial interests to Indian tax authorities.
As per the department's notice, Ambani was liable to be prosecuted under Sections 50 and 51 of the Black Money (undisclosed foreign income and assets) Imposition of Tax Act of 2015, that stipulates a maximum punishment of 10 years imprisonment with a fine.
Ambani earlier this month approached the HC challenging the notice, claiming that the Black Money Act was enacted in 2015 and the alleged transactions are of assessment years 2006-2007 and 2010-2011. Senior counsel Rafique Dada, appearing for Ambani, said provisions of the Act cannot have a retrospective effect.
Advocate Akhileshwar Sharma, appearing for the I-T department, sought time to respond to the petition.
