Live
- Chhath Puja 2024: Nahay Khay Date, Rituals, and Important Guidelines
- Rajasthan signs 2 MoUs in hospitality sector with Saudi Arabia-based firms
- Blow for BJP as Gavit quits to contest as Independent from Akkalkuwa
- EC approves Sanjay Kumar Verma’s appointment as new Maharashtra DGP
- Weather update: Light to Moderate Rain Predicted Across AP for next three days
- We can stay on top of KL Rahul for the majority of the summer: Boland
- 'Don't want to contest any more elections': Sharad Pawar says he wants to hang up boots
- Buddha’s teachings has solution to today’s problems: Prez Murmu at Asian Buddhist Summit
- HIL 2024-25: Delhi to face Gonasika in tournament opener on Dec 28
- Centre launches phase 2 of subsidised Bharat Atta, Rice to keep prices under control
CAG interference in policy matters threatens democracy
Duvvuri Subbarao, Former RBI governor
Ex-RBI governor Duvvuri Subbarao questions CAG’s authority in 2G spectrum pricing case
New Delhi: If tax concessions announced by the government are treated as 'presumptive loss' by federal auditor Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), it would diminish democracy and not enhance it, opined former RBI Governor Duvvuri Subbarao.
Subbarao, who held various positions including the Union finance secretary, wrote in his new book titled 'Just A Mercenary?: Notes from My Life and Career' about his involvement in the decision-making on the pricing of the 2G spectrum, an issue that embroiled the UPA-2 government amid charges of mammoth corruption.
"If a democratically elected government decides to forego revenue in order to serve the larger public good of deepening telecom penetration, is it open to the CAG to substitute his own judgement for the government's and call it a 'presumptive loss'?" he asked.
Subbarao was responding to a question on the 2G scam case and the CAG's investigation of the presumptive loss to the government during the UPA-2 period. "If the CAG is allowed to enter into this issue, what could then stop him to go on logically to question every tax concession in the budget as a presumptive loss? Surely, that would diminish, not enhance, our democracy," he said.
Subbarao emphasised that the prerogative of the CAG to do a special audit of spectrum pricing is unquestionable.
"However, the CAG's decision to go into the question of 'presumptive loss' to the government and the assumptions made in quantifying that loss is questionable on several grounds," he said in an interview.
Arguably, Subbarao noted that it is possible to come out with a study that would in fact show a 'presumptive gain' to the government- that the overall benefits to the government far exceed the revenue foregone-by making assumptions that would be no less robust than those underlying the CAG methodology. "More important than the estimate of presumptive loss, questionable as it was, is the CAG's locus standi in questioning the right of the government to decide to sell spectrum at below market price," he said.
In 2007, the Department of Telecom (DoT) under the erstwhile ministerial charge of A Raja of the DMK, a partner in the UPA coalition, determined that there was a case for licensing more 2G operators in each of the twenty-three telecom circles in the country in order to encourage competition in the sector.
