Live
- They always want me to win, and now I feel lucky to have been offered a story like ‘Zebra’: Satyadev Kancharana
- ‘Democracy first, humanity first’: PM Modi in Guyana's parliament on two countries' similarities
- PKL Season 11: Telugu Titans register third straight win to top standings
- Is Pollution Contributing to Your COPD?
- NASA Unveils Underwater Robots for Exploring Jupiter's Moons
- Additional Central forces arrive in violence-hit Manipur
- AR Rahman and Saira Banu’s Divorce: Legal Insights into Common Issues in Bollywood Marriages
- 82.7 pc work completed in HPCL Rajasthan Refinery area: official
- Curfew relaxation extended in 5 Manipur districts on Friday
- Tab scam prompts Bengal govt to adopt caution over fund disbursement
Section 144 Imposed In Parts Of Karnataka Including Bengaluru
Karnataka High Court
- Prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been enforced across areas of Karnataka, including Bengaluru
- From March 15 to 21, Bengaluru Police Commissioner Kamal Pant issued orders barring any public meetings, protests, and celebrations.
Prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been enforced across areas of Karnataka, including Bengaluru, ahead of the Karnataka High Court's decision on the hijab issue on Tuesday morning.
From March 15 to 21, Bengaluru Police Commissioner Kamal Pant issued orders barring any public meetings, protests, and celebrations. On Monday evening, High Court authorities met with senior police officers.
During the hearing, which began on February 10, the petitioners asserted the right to have the hijab in classrooms as part of their freedom of religion and expression, while contesting a Karnataka education department decision issued on February 5 that suggested hijabs could be forbidden.
The government directive, according to the Karnataka Advocate General, was harmless in that it did not command the restriction of religious clothing but instead left it up to institutions. However, the AG recognised that some aspects of the order may have been superfluous. Wearing the headscarf, according to the state administration, is not an essential religious practise.
Regardless of the High Court's decision on Tuesday, the case is likely to travel to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had refused to allow an immediate hearing for an appeal against the High Court's interim order on February 11, and had warned the petitioners not to "extend" the matter to greater levels.
Police and education officials are hopeful that the matter may be resolved promptly and discreetly, particularly because state school examinations for Class X will begin on March 28 and pre-university exams (for Classes XI and XII) will be held in April.
