Live
- Gurugram: 11 projects of GMDA worth Rs 249.77 crores approved
- Akali Dal stages statewide protests over ‘tardy’ paddy procurement in Punjab
- Firing on Nandan Kanan Express in Odisha, probe launched
- Indian Army Seizes Massive Cache Of Arms And Ammunition In Manipur Amid Ongoing Violence
- Polling Stations Open Across Eastern And Central US As Voters Head To The Ballots In Historic Election
- Hyatt set to expand brand presence in Nepal with hyatt regency lumbini
- ITC’s Interrobang?! 2024 unleashes a staggering 550+ innovative ideas from 4600+ students across India’s premier Business schools
- Bengal school job case: Partha Chatterjee moves fresh bail plea at special CBI court
- Choose Smarter Financial Choices Over Impulsive Spending This Festive Season – Bandhan Mutual Fund
- Samsung Tops India’s Smartphone Market with 23% Value Share in Q3: Counterpoint Research
BCI may consider emergency fund for independent lawyers, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court Thursday said the Bar Council of India (BCI) may consider an emergency fund for independent practising advocates who are in need of financial assistance and are "facing a tough time" during the COVID-19 pandemic.
NEW DEHLI: The Supreme Court Thursday said the Bar Council of India (BCI) may consider an emergency fund for independent practising advocates who are in need of financial assistance and are "facing a tough time" during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A bench headed by Justice N V Ramana, hearing a plea on the matter through video-conferencing, said it cannot pass direction for creation of funds and set up a special category for lawyers when unfortunately the entire country is facing a difficult situation.
The bench, also comprising Justices S K Kaul and B R Gavai, observed that some bar councils have taken up this issue and have also decided to help independent lawyers.
"This is something for the BCI to consider," the bench told advocate Pawan Prakash Pathak, who filed the petition.
The apex court, while referring to the coronavirus or COVID-19 pandemic, said the whole country is suffering and lawyers are also a part of it.
Pathak referred to the provision of the Advocates Act and said the BCI is responsible for safeguarding the rights, privileges and interests of advocates.
He said that courts and tribunals are closed due to the COVID-19 lockdown and independent practising lawyers are left with no other source of income.
He argued that the top court can direct the BCI to take action in this regard as also for the future.
The bench said however that it is for the BCI to consider as to how well it is in a position to help.
Pathak, who filed the plea along with advocate Alok Singh, said that "advocates are also hit by this lockdown and facing financial crunch and if the lockdown further extend then this pose a serious threat to the life and liberty of the advocates who have litigation as there only source of income."
The plea has claimed that various state bar associations across the country are coming up with financial aid scheme for advocates but there is "no uniformity or equality" in those policies.
It has also sought a direction to the BCI and bar council of states to frame a policy for fund disbursal to independent advocates who are in dire need of financial assistance within specified time limit.
