Live
- DCA seizes two drugs stocks worth Rs 5.52 lakh for overpricing
- Aiming for 14 LS Seats: Revanth has an ace up his sleeve, assigns special task to Cong MLAs
- Akbar tears Modi’s charge on Muslim family size to shreds
- Hyd echoes with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’, ‘Jai Hanuman’
- Summer holidays for schools from today
- DSCI holds meet on advancing cyber security initiatives
- Hyd Metro to extend service hrs for IPL match tomorrow
- TS BIE announces payment due dates for pvt candidates
- Dr Lankapalli Bullayya inks pact with L&T
- North Andhra will be developed on all fronts
HC demanded clarity in the K T Jaleel case
Clarification was sought as the matter requires a detailed admission hearing and the petitioner has to furnish these important details for the court to hear the petition, the order said.
The high court demanded transparency in the case claiming failure on the part of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) in registering an FIR in the row over appointment of minister K T Jaleel's relative K T Adeeb as general manager at Minorities Development Finance Corporation.
Justice P Ubaid ordered that the petitioner, P K Firos, Muslim Youth League general secretary, should explain on seven points ahead of the court considering the scope for a prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The petitioner should inform the court whether anybody has so far challenged the deputation appointment, whether there was a government order by which required qualification was diluted, whether sanction for prosecution has been obtained, whether the appointment is regular or on deputation, whether the appointee derived any undue advantage or illegal benefit other than admissible salary and benefits, whether the complaint filed before VACB contains the essentials of any criminal misconduct as defined under Prevention of Corruption Act, and whether the grievance is only about violation of rules in the appointment process.
