Live
- Hindware's 'Build a Toilet, Build Her Future' Initiative: Transforming Lives, One Toilet at a Time
- Constitution a guide to our present as well as future: PM Modi
- Nothing India Expands Service Network with New Exclusive Service Centres in Hyderabad
- Instagram DM Updates: Fun New Features with Nicknames, Live Location Sharing, and Sticker Packs
- Andhra Pradesh played major role in framing Constitution- CM
- Centre not willing to restore J&K’s full statehood: J&K Congress chief
- Bengal: BSF apprehends Bangladeshi smuggler with gold biscuits, seizes consignment of air rifles
- Fake Doctor Arrested in Hyderabad's Hayathnagar
- BJP slams Rahul Gandhi for renewing Veer Savarkar-bashing after Maha polls
- New Zealand study highlights online harm for eight-year-olds
Kerala files suit in SC against Centre’s interference with State’s finances
Supreme Court of India
Kerala government has filed an original suit before the Supreme Court alleging interference by the Centre with the finances of the State.
New Delhi: Kerala government has filed an original suit before the Supreme Court alleging interference by the Centre with the finances of the State.
The suit filed by the state government raises questions over the authority of the Union government to interfere with the powers of the State to regulate its own finances under several provisions of the Constitution.
The plea alleged that the Union Ministry of Finance through issued letters in March 2023 and by amendments made to Section 4 of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act seeks to interfere with the finances of the State by imposing a Net Borrowing Ceiling and by reducing the Net Borrowing Ceiling thereby including aspects into the “borrowing” of the State which, otherwise, are not “borrowings” as contemplated under Article 293 of the Constitution.
It added that the Union goverment imposed conditions in the guise of exercise of powers under Article 293(3) read with Article 293(4) that curtails the exclusive constitutional powers of the State.
Further, it stated that the State has the exclusive power to regulate its finance through preparation and management of its Budget and Borrowing and “the reduction in borrowing limits will have an extremely deleterious impact and long-term economic damage to the State.”
“The Defendant through the Impugned Amendments has encroached into the legislative domain of the Plaintiff State as “Public Debt of the State” is an item exclusively in the State List in the Seventh Schedule under Article 246 of the Constitution,” the plea said.
It stated that the Impugned Orders and Impugned Amendment create unconstitutional limits and impediments on the State to borrow and regulate its own finances, therefore violating the provisions and principles of fiscal federalism under the Constitution.
The plea added that the State has the constitutional power to legislate on its Borrowings as empowered under Article 199 and manage the same in accordance with the Constitution.
