Live
- Sr Men's National Hockey: Delhi, Karnataka, Bengal, A.P. win group matches on Day 2
- ‘Nation is proud of you’: West Bengal Guv to GRSE on laying keels of two NGOPVS
- Kirttane, Kapadia bag golden double as India wins 14 medals in Asia Pickleball Games
- Gurugram: 11 projects of GMDA worth Rs 249.77 crores approved
- Akali Dal stages statewide protests over ‘tardy’ paddy procurement in Punjab
- Firing on Nandan Kanan Express in Odisha, probe launched
- Indian Army Seizes Massive Cache Of Arms And Ammunition In Manipur Amid Ongoing Violence
- Polling Stations Open Across Eastern And Central US As Voters Head To The Ballots In Historic Election
- Hyatt set to expand brand presence in Nepal with hyatt regency lumbini
- ITC’s Interrobang?! 2024 unleashes a staggering 550+ innovative ideas from 4600+ students across India’s premier Business schools
Kerala files suit in Supreme Court against Centre’s interference with State’s finances
Supreme Court of India
Kerala government has filed an original suit before the Supreme Court alleging interference by the Centre with the finances of the State.
New Delhi: Kerala government has filed an original suit before the Supreme Court alleging interference by the Centre with the finances of the State.
The suit filed by the state government raises questions over the authority of the Union government to interfere with the powers of the State to regulate its own finances under several provisions of the Constitution.
The plea alleged that the Union Ministry of Finance through issued letters in March 2023 and by amendments made to Section 4 of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act seeks to interfere with the finances of the State by imposing a Net Borrowing Ceiling and by reducing the Net Borrowing Ceiling thereby including aspects into the “borrowing” of the State which, otherwise, are not “borrowings” as contemplated under Article 293 of the Constitution.
It added that the Union goverment imposed conditions in the guise of exercise of powers under Article 293(3) read with Article 293(4) that curtails the exclusive constitutional powers of the State.
Further, it stated that the State has the exclusive power to regulate its finance through preparation and management of its Budget and Borrowing and “the reduction in borrowing limits will have an extremely deleterious impact and long-term economic damage to the State.”
“The Defendant through the Impugned Amendments has encroached into the legislative domain of the Plaintiff State as “Public Debt of the State” is an item exclusively in the State List in the Seventh Schedule under Article 246 of the Constitution,” the plea said.
It stated that the Impugned Orders and Impugned Amendment create unconstitutional limits and impediments on the State to borrow and regulate its own finances, therefore violating the provisions and principles of fiscal federalism under the Constitution.
The plea added that the State has the constitutional power to legislate on its Borrowings as empowered under Article 199 and manage the same in accordance with the Constitution.
