Live
- PM Modi highlights govt's efforts to make Odisha prosperous and one of the fastest-growing states
- Hezbollah fires 200 rockets at northern, central Israel, injuring eight
- Allu Arjun's Family Appearance on Unstoppable with NBK Breaks Viewership Records
- Unity of hearts & minds essential for peace & progress, says J&K Lt Governor
- IPL 2025 Auction: I deserve Rs 18 cr price, says Chahal on being acquired by Punjab Kings
- EAM Jaishankar inaugurates new premises of Indian embassy in Rome
- Sailing vessel INSV Tarini embarks on second leg of expedition to New Zealand
- Over 15,000 people affected by rain-related disasters in Sri Lanka
- IPL 2025 Auction: RCB acquire Hazlewood for Rs 12.50 cr; Gujarat Titans bag Prasidh Krishna at Rs 9.5 crore
- Maharashtra result reflects the outcome of Congress' destructive politics: BJP's Shazia Ilmi
Political Blame Game Escalates Between Uddhav Thackeray And Devendra Fadnavis Over Alleged Power-Sharing Deal
- Uddhav Thackeray, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief, accuses Devendra Fadnavis of reneging on a supposed agreement to groom his son Aaditya as the next CM while he moves to Delhi.
- Fadnavis dismisses the claims, calling Thackeray "delirious" and emphasizing the integrity of late Balasaheb Thackeray's ideals.
The recent exchange of accusations between Uddhav Thackeray, the leader of Shiv Sena (UBT), and Devendra Fadnavis, the current Maharashtra deputy chief minister, sheds light on the intricate dynamics of Maharashtra's political landscape. At the heart of the controversy lies a purported power-sharing agreement between the erstwhile Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alliance, with allegations of betrayal and broken promises flying from both sides.
Thackeray's claims suggest that prior to the 2019 elections, a significant political arrangement was discussed involving the grooming of his son, Aaditya Thackeray, as the next Chief Minister of Maharashtra, while he himself would transition to a role in the Union cabinet in Delhi. These assertions come amidst Thackeray's assertions that Amit Shah, the current Union Home Minister and former BJP chief, had visited him to seek an alliance with Shiv Sena. Thackeray recounts how assurances of a shared chief ministerial term were made in the presence of late Balasaheb Thackeray, the revered founder of Shiv Sena.
However, Fadnavis swiftly refuted these claims, accusing Thackeray of fabricating stories and displaying signs of delusion. He vehemently denied ever making such promises, dismissing Thackeray's assertions as baseless. Fadnavis emphasized the integrity and steadfastness of Balasaheb Thackeray's legacy, insinuating that Uddhav Thackeray's allegations were a departure from the principles upheld by the late Shiv Sena supremo.
The rift between the two leaders underscores the broader fissures within Maharashtra's political landscape. The exchange of barbs not only highlights the strained relationship between Shiv Sena and BJP but also reveals the complexities of power dynamics within the state. Additionally, CM Eknath Shinde's commentary further accentuates the division within the political arena, suggesting a history of strategic maneuvering and shifting allegiances.
The controversy serves as a reminder of the volatile nature of political alliances and the ever-changing landscape of power dynamics in Indian politics. As Maharashtra braces itself for future electoral battles, the fallout from these allegations may have far-reaching implications, potentially reshaping the state's political landscape in unforeseen ways.
