Live
- Chandrababu Vows Strict Measures for Women's Safety and Drug Control
- Deputy CM Bhatti Vikramarka Highlights Congress Government's Achievements
- PCC Expansive Meeting Held at Gandhi Bhavan in Hyderabad
- Formula 1: I didn't really want to come back after Brazilian GP, admits Hamilton
- IND vs AUS BGT 2024-25: Pat Cummins says the pressure of playing at home is there but team well prepared to beat India and win Border-Gavaskar Trophy
- Yastika Bhatia ruled out of remainder of WBBL 10 due to wrist fracture
- Telangana Assembly Sessions to be Held in the Second Week of December
- Must watch, says CM Yogi after seeing ‘The Sabarmati Report’; makes it tax-free in UP
- Worsening air pollution in Mongolian capital sparks public alarm
- Over 9 in 10 Indian leaders anticipate an increase in cybersecurity budgets next year
SC notice on Atishi, Kejriwal’s plea, stays court proceedings
The Supreme Court on Monday sought response from the Delhi government and BJP leader Rajiv Babbar on a plea of Delhi Chief Minister Atishi and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal challenging the high court order refusing to quash a defamation case against them.
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Monday sought response from the Delhi government and BJP leader Rajiv Babbar on a plea of Delhi Chief Minister Atishi and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal challenging the high court order refusing to quash a defamation case against them.
A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti issued a notice in the matter and stayed the proceedings in the trial court. Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Atishi and Kejriwal, submitted that the defamation case has been filed by Babbar, as authorised representative of BJP Delhi.
“BJP, neither central nor Delhi, has not filed any complaint. Babbar is not the person I have allegedly defamed,” he submitted.
Senior advocate Sonia Mathur, appearing for Babbar, stated that the BJP leader has filed the case on behalf of the party. Both Atishi and Kejriwal have challenged the September 2 order of the Delhi High Court, which had refused to quash the proceedings against them and other AAP leaders over their remarks about alleged deletion of names of voters, saying the imputations prima facie lowered the reputation of the BJP.
The high court had said the imputations were prima facie defamatory with an intention of vilifying the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and gaining undue political mileage.
