Live
- Man sets himself on fire near Parl building
- MLA participates in prayers at North Parish Church
- Involvement Of Canadian Colleges Under Lens: ED probes human trafficking racket
- Water security biggest challenge of 21stC : PM
- 32 survive Kazakhstan air crash
- CM Revanth for CWC meet in Belagavi today
- Rich tributes paid to former PM Vajpayee
- Priority to Christian Dalits and tribals in housing scheme: CM Revanth
- 3-day ‘Kuchipudi Pataka Swarnotsavalu’ to begin tomorrow
- Vajpayee hailed for introducing several admin reforms
Supreme Court judgment tomorrow on validity of UP Madarsa Act
Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court is set to deliver on Tuesday its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the Allahabad High Court ruling which had struck down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act
New Delhi: The Supreme Court is set to deliver on Tuesday its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the Allahabad High Court ruling which had struck down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as unconstitutional and violative of the principles of secularism.
As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, a bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud will pronounce its decision on November 5.
Earlier in April, staying the impugned decision, the Bench, also comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, had observed that the Allahabad High Court misconstrued the provisions of the Madarsa Act and the view taken by it was prima facie not correct.
Delivering a verdict on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an advocate challenging vires of the Madarsa Act, 2004, the Allahabad HC, in its March 22 order, had held the law violative of the principles of secularism, Articles 14, 21 and 21-A of the Constitution of India and Section 22 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956.
It had asked the Uttar Pradesh government to take steps to accommodate madrasa students in regular schools, adding that if required, new schools would be established to ensure that children between the ages of 6 to 14 years are not left without admission in duly recognised institutions.
With less than a week's time left to him in the highest judicial office of the country, CJI Chandrachud is yet to pronounce several important decisions, including the AMU minority status case.
Before his retirement on November 10, the CJI-led Constitution Bench will also decide the question as to whether Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence holders require a separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle of LMV class.
