Live
- DIG asks cops to adhere to rules
- KSRTC Dasara festivities: Staff expresses discontent on meagre Ayudha Pooja allowance
- Goddess blessed devotees as Kalarathri
- 251 paddy collection centres to be set up
- Khammam dist gets 933 new teachers
- False campaign against CMR Group condemned
- YS Jagan Mourns the Demise of Industrialist Ratan Tata
- Toxic tea powder making racket busted, 3 arrested
- Low enrolment in Mangalore University PG courses
- CM Revanth Reddy Extends Greetings on Saddula Bathukamma Festival
‘Turtle employees’, Phyletic gradualism and Cladogenesis …. Learn your HR wisdom from nature
Highlights
Every individual employee in all corporate constantly adapt and evolve to live/exist continuously in the same corporate ecosystem. The owners of some small organizations often claim that some of their employees have joined as ‘trainee’ several years ago but now they have evolved to the level of Director/Vice President etc.
Every individual employee in all corporate constantly adapt and evolve to live/exist continuously in the same corporate ecosystem. The owners of some small organizations often claim that some of their employees have joined as ‘trainee’ several years ago but now they have evolved to the level of Director/Vice President etc.
The owners refer such examples so loudly only to prove the point that the organization offers equal opportunity to all employees to grow. Interestingly, the entire process of such changes would have taken 20 or more years.
Whereas in MNC’s, different people might join as trainee or manager on same day with same educational and experience back ground but one or two might evolve fast to the level of vice president in short span of time while many others would remain in the same designation. What does it mean? The HR might although define such events to be as recognition of talent/capability, the true understanding of the above is virtually lacking with most corporate.
The above two types of evolutions can be seen in nature as well. There are two major types of evolutions do occur in nature viz.,
1. Phyletic gradualism
2. Cladogenesis
The first one refers to the species in the given population gradually transforming/evolving over a period of time and reaching to ‘some level of finality’ in the given ecosystem. The best example is ‘trainee’ becoming ‘vice president’ or ‘president’ in the same corporate over 20 years.
The other type of evolution – Cladogenesis is defined as, due to some genetically restricted rare and rapid events branching or splitting the species and transforming them into totally another one. Such changes are not time dependent.
The first type of evolution is most likely to occur in all most all species.
In the same corporate when people continue for over 20 years, naturally they would learn to live in the same corporate for another 20 or more years also. These people knows how to outsmart all talented people who later join the organization as the newly joined people always relay mostly on their talents but the ‘age old pre-existing turtles’ (the people who are with the same organization for several years) on their ‘adaptability and cunningness’ within the organization.
Some of these ‘turtle’ people may not contribute much because they have been adapting within the organization as a product of the organization. The are not the real cause of change. Therefore, the corporate must look for the second category of people as they can suddenly and spontaneously evolve out as ‘distinguished leaders’.
Question may be raised as why only some people show such evolutionary traits and not all those who have joined the organization on the same day, at same cadre with same educational background and role and responsibility?
The cladogenesis occurs only due to some restricted rare and rapid genetic changes. It means certain restricted and individual specific changes only make certain people to respond and transform into another.
The corporate has to understand the restricted and rapid changes that can make even an ordinary person to become great leaders. Once such details are understood, ‘breeding’ right kind of leaders is possible.
The senior leaders in corporate should not look for leaders of phyletic gradualism. Such leaders may not contribute much to your corporate.
Transforming the organization to meet the new challenges are only required from leaders and not the trait of getting transformed progressively within the organization for own success and survival. Such adaptations would give only success to the individual employees and not to the organization.
Dr S Ranganathan
Next Story
ADVERTISEMENT
