Live
- 2024 on track to be hottest year on record
- PM Modi’s visit to Solapur: Women applaud ‘Double-Engine’ government’s initiatives
- Nagarkurnool MLA Dr. Kuchukulla Rajesh Reddy Campaigning in Maharashtra Elections
- Wife Kills Husband with Her Lover: Details of Veldanda Murder Case Revealed by SP Gaikwad
- Strict Action on Violations of Food Rights: Telangana Food Commission Chairman Goli Srinivas Reddy
- Smooth Conduct of Group-3 Exams with Strict Security Measures: Collector Badavath Santosh
- Delhi HC orders cancellation of LOC issued against Ashneer Grover, wife
- Shami’s absence a major blow for India in BGT, says Paul Adams
- Will organize protests at borders if attack on minority Hindus in Bangladesh not stopped: Bengal LoP
- Dutch Ambassador Marisa Gerard Meets Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy in Delhi
IPC Sec. 506 & 507
The TRS government is drawing fire from opposition parties for its move to empower local police in registering cases under Sections 506 and 507 against those who criticise the government. The opposition has mounted a scathing attack that the government was violating the Constitution by taking away the fundamental rights granted to the people.
The TRS government is drawing fire from opposition parties for its move to empower local police in registering cases under Sections 506 and 507 against those who criticise the government. The opposition has mounted a scathing attack that the government was violating the Constitution by taking away the fundamental rights granted to the people.
The Congress said that Chief Minister K Chandrashekhar Rao was no authority to permit the police to book cases against those who level allegations against his government. The government wants to encroach upon the jurisdiction of courts by himself acting as the judge, it alleged.
It feared that the powers under the said sections would be prone to misuse by the party in power and those who criticise the government could be harassed using police force in the name of investigation. Government contention cannot withstand the legal scrutiny and the landmark SC verdict in 2015 which declared ultra vires Section 66A of the Information and Technology Act to support freedom of expression.
The Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code reads as follows: “506. Punishment for criminal intimidation.—Whoever commits, the offence of criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprison¬ment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both; If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc.—And if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or 1[imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute, unchastity to a woman, shall be punished with imprison¬ment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.”
The Section 507 in The Indian Penal Code states that: “507. Criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication.—Whoev¬er commits the offence of criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication, or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, in addition to the punishment provided for the offence by the last preceding section.”
