Live
- Travel Strollers Contrasted: Capability, Comfort and Ease of Transportability
- Bengal PDS case: ED seeks report on medical conditions of jailed former minister
- Siddharth's Romantic Drama Miss You Set to Hit Theaters on November 29
- India’s 1st AI data bank to boost national security launched
- Humbled to receive 'Key to the City of Georgetown', says PM Modi in Guyana
- 11 lakh BPL cards revoked, claims K’taka BJP
- Exit polls results indicated victory of the NDA government in Maharashtra and Jharkhand!
- Deputy CM Bhatti Vikramarka Reviews SC/ST Development Funds Implementation
- AP cabinet approves key decisions, check here
- Maharashtra records 58.22 pc turnout, Independent candidate dies of heart attack in Beed
CBSE textbook defines '36-24-36' as best female body shape, sparks row
Excerpts from a class XII Physical Education textbook defining 36-24-36 as the \"best body shape for females\" have sparked an outrage on social media with critics demanding that the text be withdrawn.
Excerpts from a class XII Physical Education textbook defining 36-24-36 as the "best body shape for females" have sparked an outrage on social media with critics demanding that the text be withdrawn.
The book titled "Health and Physical Education" written by Dr VK Sharma and published by Delhi-based New Saraswati House, is taught at various schools affiliated to CBSE.
CBSE, however, clarified that it "does not recommend any books by private publishers in its schools".
"36-24-36 shape of females is considered the best. That is why in Miss World or Miss Universe competitions, such type of shape is also taken into consideration," read an excerpt from the chapter "Physiology and Sports" which is going viral.
Various Twitter users shared picture of the mentioned text and demanded that the publishers withdraw the content and schools replace the book in their curriculum.
In a statement, the CBSE said, "Schools are expected to exercise extreme care while selecting books of private publishers and the content must be scrutinised to preclude any objectionable content that hurts the feeling of any class, community, gender, religious group. Schools have to take responsibility of the content of the books prescribed by them."
This, however, is not the first incident about improper content being found in textbooks taught in CBSE schools in recent months.
Excerpts from a class IV environmental science textbook that suggested students to "kill a kitten" as part of an experiment had gone viral on social media, forcing the publisher to withdraw it from the market last month.
Similarly, a class XII Sociology book cited "ugliness" and physical disability of a girl as reasons behind the dowry issue prevalent in the country.
The HRD Ministry had last month said that CBSE has no mechanism to evaluate the quality of textbooks of private publishers.
"There is no mechanism to evaluate the quality of textbooks of private publishers. The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has no mandate to prescribe or recommend the textbooks of private publishers in its affiliated schools," Minister of State for HRD Upendra Kushwaha had said in response to a written question in Lok Sabha.
