Live
- Hyderabad Comic Con: A Thrilling Celebration of Comics, Gaming, and Pop Culture
- Football: Trio leave Spain squad, Barrios gets call-up for Nations League clash with Swiss
- Dragon boat races during water festival in Cambodia ends with award ceremony
- Manipur bodies recovery: Widespread mob violence reported, curfew imposed, mobile internet suspended
- WPGT 2024: Hitaashee doubles lead to six shots in 14th Leg; Nayanika Sanga, Vidhatri Urs in pursuit
- Despite ideological differences, Cong has highest respect for Balasaheb Thackeray: Priyanka Gandhi
- Waqf row: BJP to stage protests before DC offices across Karnataka
- Disinformation major challenge, says Pak army chief after drawing flak on social media
- Digital media platforms must curb fake news, safeguard democracy: Ashwini Vaishnaw
- BJP wants to form govt in Jharkhand to loot its natural resources: Kharge
Jaitley files application seeking perjury proceedings against Kejriwal
Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has filed an application seeking perjury proceedings against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday for allegedly filing a false affidavit before the Delhi High Court.
New Delhi: Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has filed an application seeking perjury proceedings against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday for allegedly filing a false affidavit before the Delhi High Court.
Kejriwal, in the affidavit, had claimed that he had not given any instruction to his counsel and senior advocate Ram Jethmalani to use abusive language during the cross examination against Jaitley.
The High Court has issued notice to Kejriwal to reply in regards to the matter.
Earlier, the court directed defendant Kejriwal that no scandalous or abusive question would be asked to plaintiff by the defendants lawyer.
During the hearing of the application, the court also observed that if scandalous and abusive language would be used by the counsel of a person who is sitting on a constitutional post, then what example will it set for the common people.
The Delhi High Court was hearing the defamation plea, filed by Jaitley, over the use of an 'objectionable word' by Kejriwal's counsel Ram Jethmalani.
A notice was issued to Kejriwal to respond on why defamation proceedings should not be initiated against him.
Jaitley's application also contends that Kejriwal's intention is to delay the conclusion of recording of evidence by posing irrelevant questions, which are designed to be insulting and annoying.
His application sought directions to expedite the recording of evidence in a time bound, fair, dignified and bonafide manner in the ongoing civil defamation case for Rs. 10 crore against Kejriwal.
Jaitley's application came in connection with the defamation case against Kejriwal in the Delhi & District Cricket Association (DDCA) case.
Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation suit against Kejriwal and five other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders including Ashutosh, Kumar Vishwas, Sanjay Singh, Raghav Chaddha and Deepak Bajpai.
In his complaint, Jaitley had accused Kejriwal and others of defaming him in a controversy regarding the DDCA and sought Rs 10 crore as damages. Jaitley was president of the DDCA for over a decade.
