Live
- Mumbai: 1 dies after hit by actor’s car
- Revenue Sadassulu aimed at resolving land rows: Minister
- GMC Council pays rich tributes to Dr Manmohan Singh
- Selection trials for EG kabaddi teams today
- Sorry, says Putin over Azerbaijan crash
- Scholarships to be distributed to students today
- Promote use of Telugu in admin, govt urged
- Govt 'insulted' former PM: Rahul
- Revanth, Naidu & Lokesh to join world leaders at Davos meet
- TTD denies reports on accepting letters from TG leaders
Just In
Widows entitled to family pension even after remarriage: CAT
The Central Administrative Tribunal CAT has said the widow of a deceased government servant is eligible for family pension even after remarriage
New Delhi: The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has said the widow of a deceased government servant is eligible for family pension even after remarriage.
Administrative member Praveen Mahajan ordered restoration of the family pension to Delhi resident Renu Gupta (47), wife of late Pawan Kumar Gupta, an employee of the Defence Ministry at the time of his death, saying Gupta had requested for transfer of the family pension in the name of her son after her re-marriage without understanding the consequences.
The CAT asked the Ministry of Defence to transfer the pension claim to her from her son's name within four months.
"Without understanding the consequences, she requested for transfer of the family pension in the name of her son after her marriage.
However, the said family pension will become inadmissible after the son attains the age of 25 years," the tribunal said, adding that, "It has been held by the government that even in the case of remarriage of a widow, family pension can be given".
The bench rejected the contention of the ministry and said that she was "legally entitled for family pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972" and there seems to be "no legal bar in re-transferring the pension in her name".
The Defence Ministry had appointed Gupta as store keeper in 1998 on compassionate ground after the death of her husband the year before.
She was also granted family pension in accordance to Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 and other retiral benefits were offered.
Gupta remarried after, which at her own request, the family pension was sanctioned afresh to their son, Karan Gupta in 2002.
However, in 2013, she had sent multiple requests for restoration of her family pension, which was subsequently rejected every time and she was informed that she cannot be granted the pension since she had re-married.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com