Live
- 2 in 5 employees believe AI, machine learning biggest skill gap: Report
- BigBasket and Blinkit Race to Deliver iPhone 16 in Under 10 Minutes
- Amazon Great Indian Festival 2024: Best Printers to Buy Under Rs 20,000
- RG Kar scam: CBI gets clues of Sandip Ghosh illegally awarding contracts to biz entity
- Malvika Bansod loses to Akane Yamaguchi in China Open quarterfinals
- Natural farming team invited to Mexico
- Flood-hit urged to avail loan rescheduling
- 400 women’s cases resolved in AP: Women’s Commission
- Centre allocated Rs 250 cr under the SASI: Durgesh
- 12,000 new agri power connections given: Gottipati
Just In
We need checks and balances against concentration of global power in the hands of tech companies, techies or worse - algorithms that take a life of their own. This is a social issue that cyber security alone cannot address
We need checks and balances against concentration of global power in the hands of tech companies, techies or worse - algorithms that take a life of their own. This is a social issue that cyber security alone cannot address
When it comes to digitisation of everything and hyper-connectivity, along with cyber security and privacy, our real concern is a total breakdown of social accountability. We live in societies where politics, religion and media play the roles necessary to ensure adherence to acceptable social frameworks and maintain harmony. However, the pace of growth of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has overwhelmed the traditional pillars of our social order. We need Socio-Tech frameworks that ensure social accountability and ensure that human destiny is in the hands of humans, not algorithms.
Limits of cyber security approach
Practitioners and innovators in civilian sectors do not normally think in terms of security. Security is usually a function assigned to governments with clearly defined jurisdictions. Generally speaking, we expect our nation’s internal security agencies to uphold law and order domestically, and our military to deal with external adversaries. There are no effective laws and regulations in the cyber world and it transcends international borders. The reality is that most governments are helpless when it comes to dealing with cyber security.
In the name of better understanding, serving and even protecting us, the cyber world has unleashed increasingly sophisticated methods for data gathering, analytics and user applications. Here is a scenario on Google and its capabilities: Day before yesterday - tracks your moves and knows you better than your spouse; Yesterday - predicts your next moves and knows you better than you know yourself; Today - automatically tailors your personal, social and professional world for you; and Tomorrow? It automatically designs an entire life from the time of birth (or even before that!)
Regarding Facebook, while our society is still trying to wrap its head around unlimited sharing of our pictures, posts and feelings, it is reportedly making moves to make telepathy a reality - potentially the ultimate privacy nightmare!
The need for socio-tech accountability
The question is not how far-fetched are these ideas. It is whether we, as a society, should let it happen without accountability. Advances in ICT do offer major benefits to humanity. The real issue is that our social frameworks have been unable to catch up with technological advances.
In early 2016, when cyber security “Guru” Bruce Schneier was asked when we might seriously start addressing our cyber issues, he said that a catastrophic failure of US healthcare, transportation or voting systems may provide a wakeup call. Less than a year later, amid widespread speculation that 2016 US Presidential Election was manipulated through cyber means, he pointed out that there are no clear guidelines on what to do if, in fact, the election was hacked. Whether it was foreign meddling or a coup orchestrated with help from elements within the US Military and Corporate America, it is hard to fathom the possibility that the mighty United States failed to defend the integrity of its own democracy.
It is no longer about cyber security and privacy, but the reality that unprecedented power to control individuals and societies is being placed at the hands of software programmers. Not too long ago, terrorists hijacked planes or blew themselves up to further their ideology. Today, cyber “activists” in Beer-Sheva, Israel or Christchurch, New Zealand could access sensitive data, decode algorithms and release well-tailored information on “free” digital platforms to much more effectively further their ideology against the free will of our society.
The most striking part of publically available declassified report from US Intelligence Community on the election meddling was the amount of focus on the media platform RT and its methods. Let me highlight this line from the report: “RT is making its social media operations a top priority, both to avoid broadcast TV regulations and to expand its overall audience.” The irony here is that Silicon Valley startups have been hugely rewarded when they come up with “innovative ways” to avoid regulations and expand user base globally.
We need checks and balances against concentration of global power in the hands of tech companies, techies or worse - algorithms that take a life of their own. This is a social issue that cyber security alone cannot address. In order to find effective solutions, we need to first articulate and create widespread social awareness on the actual problem. Time to act was yesterday, please wake up, society!
(Writer is CEO of Socio-Tech Academy LLC (STA), Colorado. The original article was published on STA website – www.socio-tech.org)
Karthik Krishna
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com