Live
- PKL Season 11: We're determined to push for top spot in standings, says Puneri Paltan coach BC Ramesh
- Awareness Program on the Harmful Effects of Tobacco Products
- Delhi govt re-launched senior citizen pension scheme despite challenges: Bharadwaj
- Bihar Assembly's winter session begins, three newly elected MLAs take oath
- Inflation to ease, economic growth to accelerate in coming months: Finance Ministry
- Protesters clash with police in J&K’s Katra town
- Senior Bengaluru Police Officer Accused in Suicide of Businesswoman S Jeeva
- Sidhu makes U-turn, says wife underwent cancer treatment along with Ayurveda-based diet
- Demand for entry-level talent surges 59 pc in India’s tech sector
- AIIMS adds 2 new MRI machines to provide more efficient & timely radiology diagnosis
Understanding NOTA
None Of The Above’, or NOTA for short, also known as ‘against all’ or a ‘scratch’ vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of all of the candidates in a voting system. It is based on the principle that consent requires the ability to withhold consent in an election, just as they can by voting ‘No’ on ballot questions.
None Of The Above’, or NOTA for short, also known as ‘against all’ or a ‘scratch’ vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of all of the candidates in a voting system. It is based on the principle that consent requires the ability to withhold consent in an election, just as they can by voting ‘No’ on ballot questions.
Entities that include ‘None of the Above’ on ballots as standard procedure include India (‘None of the above’), Greece (white), the U.S. state of Nevada (None of These Candidates), Ukraine (‘against all’), Spain (voto en blanco, ‘white vote’), and Colombia (voto en blanco). Russia had such an option on its ballots (‘against all’) until it was abolished in 2006.
Bangladesh introduced this option in 2008.Pakistan introduced this option on ballot papers for the 2013 Pakistan elections, but the Election Commission of Pakistan later rejected it. Beginning with the 2016 presidential election, Bulgaria introduced a 'none of the above' option, which received 5.59% of the vote in the first round and 4.47% in the run-off.
When ‘None of the Above’ is listed on a ballot, there is the possibility of NOTA receiving a majority or plurality of the vote, and so ‘winning’ the election. In such a case, a variety of formal procedures may be invoked, including having the office remain vacant, having the office filled by appointment, re-opening nominations or holding another election (in a body operating under parliamentary procedure), or it may have no effect whatsoever, as in India and the US state of Nevada, where the next highest total wins regardless.
The Election Commission of India told the Supreme Court in 2009 that it wished to offer the voter a ‘none of the above’ option on ballots, which the government had generally opposed. The People's Union for Civil Liberties, a non-governmental organisation, filed a public-interest litigation statement in support of this.
On 27 September 2013, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the right to register a ‘none of the above’ vote in elections should apply, and ordered the Election Commission to provide such a button in the electronic voting machines, noting that it would increase participation.
The Election Commission also clarified that even though votes cast as NOTA are counted, they are considered as invalid votes so they will not change the outcome of the election process. They are not taken into account for calculating the total valid votes and will not be considered for determining the forfeiture of security deposit. In the 2014 general election, NOTA polled 1.1% of the votes, counting to over 6,000,000.
The specific symbol for NOTA, a ballot paper with a black cross across it, was introduced on 18 September 2015. The symbol is designed by National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad.
